Search This Blog

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Zoo Review: Zoo New England - Franklin Park Zoo

The geography of zoos has always puzzled me.  Cities that I never thought of us major metropolises - Cincinnati, Toledo, Omaha, Kansas City - wind up with some magnificent zoos, while some of the biggest, oldest cities in the country... sometimes don't.

Until fairly recently, Boston was definitely a "don't."  Opened in 1912, the Franklin Park Zoo, located in the city's Emerald Necklace of parks, had been in decline for many years - by the 1980's, magazine articles referred to it as one of America's worst zoos.  That all began to change shortly after - an ambitious program of new exhibit construction, changing collection plans, and new management turned the city zoo around completely.  Still a relatively small zoo compared to those found in other major eastern cities, the Franklin Park Zoo of today is a far superior facility to what it was just a few short years ago.


The exhibit which truly heralded the rebirth of the Franklin Park Zoo is its flagship Tropical Forest building.  When it opened in 1989 it was limited solely to African species; it now contains a fairly even mixture of African and South American animals.  Gorillas are the stars here, occupying a large, rocky habitat (one Boston gorilla, a young male named Little Joe, brought Franklin Park some unwanted fame due to a series of escapes he pulled off).  Also found in the building are dwarf crocodiles, giant anteaters, Baird's tapirs, capybara, DeBrazza's monkeys, and cotton-topped tamarins.  Pygmy hippos may be seen either across a moat or from an underwater viewing gallery, while fruit bats and pottos (lemur-like primates) are displayed in nocturnal habitats.  A small reptile gallery is dominated by massive green anacondas.  Flitting about the forest are different species of tropical birds, while larger birds - saddle-billed storks and griffon vultures - are confined to specific enclosures.  Outside, grassy habitats house cranes (including very rarely-exhibited Siberian cranes) and spotted hyenas (but not together).



More African animals can be seen across the zoo in a series of savanna yards.  Maasai giraffes and Grevy's zebra occupy one yard, while just up the path a second yard houses plains zebra, wildebeest, and ostrich in Serengeti Crossing.  A trail sneaking behind the second yard leads to Kalahari Kingdom, where lions may be observed from several vantage points - including through the windshield of a jeep that appears to have crashed through the exhibit's viewing windows.  Nearby, an extra enclosure was squeezed in to accommodate confiscated tigers that were in need of a home.  Scattered around the lions and the zebras are additional habitats for Kori bustard, bongo, red river hog, warthog, and crested porcupines.  Tucked among the animals is a lonely little stone tower.  This is Sargent's Folly, the last remnant of an estate which predated Franklin Park (the zoo and the park itself), dating back to 1840 - a fun little sighting for any history buffs in your party.


Across from Tropical Forest is the zoo's other major indoor exhibit, Bird World.  This Asian-styled pagoda is a relatively small bird house, consisting of a few habitat-themed galleries: swamp, rainforest, desert, and riverbank.  Among the birds seen inside are tawny frogmouths, boat-billed herons, and aracaris.  More birds are seen outside, either in a row of aviaries attached to the building, in the waterfowl pond, or in a small flamingo pool.  The coolest exhibit, however, is the Andean condor aviary - visitors walk through the center of the massive flight cage in an enclosed walkway, while the giant vultures swoop overhead (or, more accurately, sit and preen while periodically glaring at you... because that's what condors do).


More birds can be seen in the zoo's Australia area, not least of all in the budgie feeding aviary.  Far more exciting for a zoo buff (though probably no one else) are the kiwis, seen in a special nocturnal building.  Mammals can be found in Australia too, of course - a walk-through kangaroo exhibit allows for close-up encounters with the big marsupials.

The zoo's last major exhibit area is the Children Zoo, designed around the concepts of play and exploration.  Visitors young and old enter a number of habitats and meet different animals - red panda climbing through tree branches, cranes and waterfowl milling around a stream in a walk-through aviary, or prairie dogs bustling around their town (where kids can pop up in the middle of the exhibit in a Plexiglas dome).  Many of the displays are interactive and encourage the uses of the senses - one display allows children to climb a replication eagle nest, then use their lofty perch to go on a scavenger hunt for small "animals" hidden around the Children's Zoo.  Next to the Children Zoo is a small interactive barnyard.


Even in the last few years, between my most recent visit and the one prior to that, Franklin Park Zoo has grown and refined itself tremendously.  Some of the new exhibits are quite nice - the Giraffe Savannah, for instance, is one of my favorite displays of African ungulates - spacious, beautiful panoramic views.  There are some educational/interpretive aspects that I also loved.  The Children's Zoo was great, for instance.  And I loved the hidden safari clues that were scattered among the savanna exhibits - a fake impala carcass stashed up in a tree, for instance, showing where a leopard had supposedly stashed its kill, or an ostrich nest, complete with replica eggs that kids could sit on.

Some of the exhibits that were state of the art at the time of their opening, however, are now beginning to show their age.  Bird's World struck me as kind of... empty.  Walking through it, I found myself imaging how I would restock it to make more active multi-species aviaries.  Tropical Forest is the quintessential zoo rainforest building that I don't like.  It's basically a monkey house with lots of fake rocks.  Considering the species involved, I wonder if there is a way to replace some of the smaller habitats with larger, mixed-species ones - for example, forming one large habitat for giant anteater, capybara, and tapir, rather than three smaller ones.  Ideally, the building could be gutted and redone completely, but I can't begin to imagine how much that would cost...


Which isn't to say that I don't like Franklin Park Zoo.  I really do.  It's just that I see the potential for it to do so much.  The zoo has already come so far.  With a little more time and more resources, I'm sure it can accomplish some wonderful things for its visitors and its animals.




Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Saying "No" to Nosey's Law

Last year, a Florida couple - Hugo and Franciszka Liebel - were arrested in Alabama and charged with animal cruelty.  As is often the case in these situations, the animal in question was confiscated and placed in temporary care while the case is being resolved.  What's not usual?  The animal is an African elephant, named Nosey.

Private ownership of large exotic animals - those not in zoos - tends to fly under the radar throughout much of the country.  Most Americans are entirely unaware that there are more tigers living as pets than in zoos.  Whenever private ownership does bubble up to the surface of the news, however, it's seldom in a good way - and there tend to be legal repercussions.  Ohio once had some of the loosest exotic animal ownership laws in the country.  Then came the Zanesville Incident, with big cats and bears running amok through the woods.  Now... not so much.

And so, when Nosey's story broke the news, it wasn't surprising that at least some states would stop to re-examine their own exotic animal laws.  Among those was New Jersey, which was set to pass what became known as "Nosey's Law", officially S2508, which would outlaw the use of animals in traveling acts.  Sounds good, right?

Just to be clear, this is not Nosey. It is an African elephant female that is used for elephant rides at the Natural Bridge Zoo in Natural Bridge, Virginia - though to the best of my knowledge, one that does not leave zoo grounds for traveling exhibitions

The problem with laws like these is that they are seldom written or thought out by people who actually know the issues at hands.  A strict reading of Nosey's Law would have banned not only circus elephants, but any kind of traveling exhibition of animals, which could have outlawed nature outreach programs, including possibly even zoo education departments taking their animals to schools and other settings.

Thankfully, we have Chris Christie (I honestly never thought I would type that sentence) who, to the surprise of many, vetoed the bill.  Now, Christie did so as one of his last acts as governor of New Jersey, but lawmakers are pledging to tighten up the bill, making its language more in line with their original intent (and clearly exempting zoos and aquariums) before they send it to the new governor.  Still, that was a close one.

This goes to show that it is extremely important for zoos and aquariums to keep up on upcoming legislation, lest things become passed into law which could inadvertently harm their programs or collections.  Even the best intentions can make for bad laws when implemented by well-meaning but misinformed people - and it's a heck of a lot easier to stop a law from being passed than to change it or repeal it after the fact.

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Hawaii: Nuking the Zoo?

This past year, zoos and aquariums across the country have had to cope with (almost) everything - fires, floods, terrorism, mass-shootings, and, most recently, record-shattering cold.  Think we haven't scraped the bottom of the barrel yet?

Well, we haven't yet - though for about a half an hour today, it looked like we might have.

An alert was sent out across Hawaii today announcing the ballistic missiles had been launched (presumably from North Korea) and were on their way to destroy the state.  People were all advised to take shelter.  What I would have loved to have known is - what happened at the Honolulu Zoo?  Or the Waikiki Aquarium, for that matter?

Did some staff flee the facility to try and get back to their families?  Was there a frenzy of activity in trying to move some animals to secure locations?  If so, how do you carry out such a frantic plan on a moment's notice?  Were there visitors panicking in the zoo, trying either to rush for the exits or cram into what looked like a safe place?

In the end, it was all a false alarm.  But now, it's just a reminder that there's always something else to worry about...

Friday, January 12, 2018

Sporcle Quiz: Famous Gorillas

So far on this blog, I've written about Willie B., Colo, Harambe, Jambo and Binti Jua, and, most recently, Bushman.  It turns out, there are a lot of famous gorillas out there - some of them real, some existing only on screen or in print.  See how well you know them with this latest Sporcle quiz!



Monday, January 8, 2018

Welcome to the Jungle

In one of my first blog posts, I noted that zoos and aquariums sometimes suffer from a certain... lack of creativity.  This can best be demonstrated by the sometimes repetitive nature of exhibits at many facilities.  The same geographic areas tend to be represented in the same manner, often with the same species.  Then, one facility will come up with a bold new idea... and then it is copied by everyone else.

Among those exhibits which has become a bit of a cliche is the indoor rainforest.  And like many ideas that have been repeated over and over again, the results are a mixed bag.

It's difficult to say where the first zoo indoor rainforest was created.  People have been maintaining greenhouses for millennia, since Roman times, at least, partially for food production, but just as often for recreation and aesthetics.  It doesn't take too much  imagination to add some small animals - birds, especially - to the concept.   In the zoo profession, there are very few ideas applicable to birds which don't eventually find themselves applied to small mammals - small primates, squirrels, bats.  Gradually, the concept just... grew.

Two of the first American zoo rainforests originated in Kansas, first at the Topeka Zoo, followed a few years later with the Sedgwick County Zoo in Wichita.  Both of these exhibits consisted on walk-through aviaries filled with a variety of tropical birds, living alongside monkeys, bats, squirrels, sloths, and other small mammals.  Pools housed rainforest (often Amazonian) fish, along with crocodilians. 

The exhibits were critical successes and were replicated over and over again from the 70's until the present - Jungleworld at the Bronx Zoo, Lied Jungle at Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo, and Amazonia at the Smithsonian National Zoo being famous examples.  The trend has continued - Buffalo Zoo (a place where everyone probably could use an escape to the tropics at this time of year) recently opened its Rainforest Falls.  The Roger Williams Park Zoo in Providence, Rhode Island, is currently undergoing a massive renovation of its rainforest building.

The best zoo exhibits try to recreate the experience of encountering animals in the wild.  The problem is that, truth be told, you never see animals in the rainforest in the wild.  Almost never - I spent a week of hiking through an East African rainforest.  I hiked by myself and with a group, by day and night, on game trails and going off the beaten path.  I saw a wild animal larger than my hand once - when I happened to look up and see some colobus monkeys, by chance.   There are countless species in the rainforest - but they are almost all cryptic.  When you look around, you see a wall of green.  Not the best zoo exhibit.

As a result, many zoo rainforest exhibits have a tendency to look... well, not very much like a rainforest.  A lot of them have gotten the idea that if you pour enough concrete and make it look like reddish mud, you can get away with a lot.  The end result is some boring exhibits, separated by pretty planters, all in a hot, foggy dome.  You see this most often when zoos try having too many large animals in their rainforests.  Indoor exhibits almost always tend to be smaller than outdoor ones, so this strategy can also have implications for animal welfare.  It's not necessarily my viewpoint, but I've definitely worked with some keepers (and to a degree, I still do) who view keeping an animal indoors to be an ungodly sin... but that's a whole different issue.

It was probably experiences with exhibits like the aforementioned - poured concrete, fake trees, cheesy waterfall, a series of neat little paddocks, all in an indoor row - which led me to be prepared to dislike Jungleworld and Lied Jungle so much before I saw them... only, to be fair, to be blown away when I actually saw them with my own eyes.  That being said, not everyone has the budget of WCS to make a rainforest dream a reality.

On the other hand, the best examples of the exhibit that I've seen have been the most understated - the birds, a few monkeys and sloths, turtles and fish in pools, all having full access almost everywhere.  That recreates the one aspect of the real rainforest that I enjoyed the most - the unpredictability, never knowing what was going to pop up where.   

Saturday, January 6, 2018

Species Fact Profile: Scarlet Ibis (Eudocimus ruber)

Scarlet Ibis
Eudocimus ruber (Linnaeus, 1758)

Range: Northern South America
Habitat: Wetlands, Mangroves
Diet: Crustaceans, Aquatic Insects, Mollusks, Frogs, Small Fish
Social Grouping: Large Colonies
Reproduction: Nest colonially, beginning in mid-September.  Polygynous breeders.  3-5 glossy eggs laid in each nest, hatching after 19-23 days.  Chicks are altricial.  Chicks fledge after 35 days and are independent at 75 days
Lifespan: 30 Years (Captivity)
Conservation Status: IUCN Least Concern, CITES Appendix II



  • Body length 55-75 centimeters.  Wingspan 52-56 centimeters.  Weight 600-900 grams.  Slightly webbed feet, long, thin, down-curved beak
  • Coloration is bright red, with blue-black wing tips.  Adults are more brightly colored than juveniles.  Color will fade in captive birds unless their diet is supplemented, often with beetroot or carrot
  • Nomadic, flying between interior wetlands and coastal habitats in search of food or in response to changes in water level.  
  • Vagrant ibises have been reported throughout the Caribbean and parts of the United States
  • Primary predators include wild cats and birds of prey.  It is believed that protection from predators is the main reason for the colonial behavior of the species
  • Often encountered in mxed-species foraging flocks with herons, spoonbills, storks, and ducks.  Have been observed following cattle and other large animals, feeding on insects disturbed by their movements
  • Sometimes considered to be the same species as the American white ibis (Eudocimus albus)
  • Feathers were used for ornamentation by Indian tribes in pre-Colombian South America  Also hunted for meat and eggs
  • Sometimes considered a nuisances due to their foraging (tearing up lawns, agricultural fields, golf courses), especially when they gather in large numbers
  • One of the two national birds of Trinidad and Tobago (the other being the rufous-vented chachalaca, or "cocrico")