“Shaitan was a good-looking young cheetah
with a very affectionate way about him: indeed, he was more like a great dog
than a cat. When we was still he looked
a gawky beast, but potentially beautiful; it was only when he got into action
that one realised his surpassing perfection: all his clumsiness disappeared:
his legs, which, when he was still, seemed too long for his slender body, were
hardly visible when he was at the height of his speed. During the brief space of his utmost
endeavour, there was nothing of four legs that Shaitan could not catch.”
~ Patrick O’Brian, Hussein:
an Entertainment
Hunting,
for sustenance or for sport, is perhaps the oldest category of human-animal
interactions. It predates every human
society and has been known in virtually all cultures and in all classes. Whereas peasants often hunted on a small
scale, setting snares and taking a little meat for their table whenever they
could, the most powerful and prestigious members of society often organized
elaborate, massive hunts in search of big game.
Hunting came to signify more than a means of acquiring protein for one’s
family; it became an exhibition of man’s dominion over the natural world. Man eventually began to further this dominion
when he domesticated the first animal – the wolf – and incorporated it into the
hunt as his new partner, the domestic dog.
Over the centuries, he came to make use of several other animals as
hunting partners, including falcons, hawks, and ferrets. Of all these hunting partners, the most
valuable, the most prized, and the most surprising was the cheetah.
It
is uncertain as to exactly when and where the practice of cheetah coursing (the
name given to the use of trained cheetahs for the hunt) began; what is certain
is that humans have been taming the spotted, speedy cats for thousands of
years. Unlike dogs or cats, cheetahs underwent no physiological change as a
result of being kept in captivity (virtually all coursing cheetahs were wild
caught), so historical records and artistic representations are all that
scholars have to pinpoint the origin of coursing.
Images
of a collared individual, apparently being brought as tribute to the pharaoh,
appear on an Egyptian tomb from 1450 BC, while in the Caucasus ,
a silver vase found in a burial mound dating back to 2300 BC depicts collared
cheetahs. The Egyptians were famous for
their penchant for keeping and taming wild animals, having experimented with
the domestication of gazelles, hyenas, and other wild animals, so there is some
basis to the theory that Egypt
was the point of origin for cheetah coursing.
Some authorities believe that it arose in Arabia, where cheetah coursing
and falconry were considered essential methods of capturing prey in the desert.
Other scholars believe that cheetah coursing has its origins in Persia and that
the Arabs only became familiar with it after their conquests took them into
modern-day Iran. There are records in
Persian royal poetry of kings hunting with cheetahs as early as 400 AD; it is
known that the sport was clearly established in Persia by 650 AD. Seventh century tomb murals in China depict
hunting with both cheetahs and caracals; the sport was later taken up by the
Mongol conquerors. At any rate, the geographic locale most often associated
with cheetah coursing is India.
Most
people, including several naturalists and other wildlife experts, consider the
cheetah an exclusively African species, and it is true that the speedy cats are
now found almost solely on the African continent. Within historic times, however, there was
also an Asiatic population, extending through Persia
and India . Today, all that is left of Asia’s cheetahs is
a remnant population of 60-70 individuals dozens in Iran, compared to
the thousands left in Africa. This
small population continues to suffer from habitat loss, depleted prey base, and
persecution, and it remains uncertain as to how much longer it will survive.
Coursing
cheetahs were also present in Europe, though not to the degree that they were
in Asia. The first animals began
arriving in the thirteenth century in the courts of Europe, from Russia to England . Virtually every noble household in
Renaissance Italy and France had its own coursing cheetahs, while the Holy
Roman Emperor Frederick II, an accomplished and expert falconer, had cheetahs
marching in his wedding parade.
Charlemagne, William the Conquerer are other famous monarchs known to
have practiced the sport. Paintings and
drawings of trained cheetahs, often depicted as collared and riding behind
their masters on horseback, were produced throughout the Middle Ages and into
the Renaissance. “A cheetah trained for
the hunt,” along with an Indian elephant and the customary gold and jewels, was
among the gifts sent to Leo X to celebrate his coronation as Pope. In 1764, a full 12 years before the cheetah
was first formally described by western science, England’s Duke of Cumberland
imported two “tigers” (based on paintings and descriptions, they were certainly
cheetahs) from India for coursing, an event that was memorialized in George
Stubbs’ painting A Cheetah with Two
Indians. Three cheetahs (and their
six keepers) were gifted to the English King George III by the Tippoo Sultan in
1799. Though popular and exotic,
cheetahs were never considered to be an especially important component of the
royal hunt in Europe , and were regarded more
as curiosities and status symbols than hunting partners.
This
demand for cheetahs became a large drain on the wild population. So many animals were captured and removed
from the gene pool (virtually none of whom would ever mate again) that it
doubtlessly had an effect on the wild population. The hunters, then, were removing adult
cheetahs from the wild before they were capable of breeding, preventing cubs
from being born in the wild and thereby replenishing the population. Trapping was indiscriminate, with no regard
for age and sex; the use of pits, however, trapping animals prior to the
breeding season, suggests that animals that were in their reproductive prime
were most likely to be caught. The
removal of females from the wild was doubtlessly also detrimental to the
population. Later during the year, after
cubs were born, females would range for food, returning after a hunt to their
dens in order to nurse their cubs. If a
female was trapped while out hunting one day, she would never return to her den
and her cubs would starve. If cubs were
found by humans, they were often abandoned, being seen of little value for
hunting; it seems unlikely that many (if any) of these cubs, deprived of their
mothers’ care, were able to survive to adulthood
Many
cheetahs were also removed from the wild to provide diplomatic gifts – several
were exported to China, Mongolia, and even Western Europe, either for use in
coursing (as was the case with the Duke of Cumberland) or for exhibition in
royal menageries. The trapping of India ’s
cheetahs remained at high levels into the twentieth century until there were
none left.
By
the end of the nineteenth century, the scarcity of Asiatic cheetahs was making
itself felt in the courts of the Indian nobility. Eventually, the remaining practitioners of
the sport of coursing began to import cheetahs from Africa . The importation of African animals was not
only a sign of the drastic decline of the species in Asia, it also led to the
belief – firmly entrenched in some naturalists – that the cheetah was never, in
fact, native to Asia, and that all cheetahs used over the last several
centuries had been imported from Africa.
In
modern times, someone will occasionally bring up the idea of reintroducing
cheetahs back to India ,
using individuals from the Iranian population; similar plans have been proposed
for using some of India ’s
few remaining Asian lions to reestablish a population in Iran . No definitive plans have been announced, and
considering the geopolitical tension that has surrounded Iran for the last
several decades, it seems unlikely that any will be coming in the near
future. As for cheetah coursing, it
seems, like the Asiatic cheetah itself, to have largely gone extinct.
No comments:
Post a Comment