Tables of Contents
Tables of Contents
Thursday, July 30, 2020
Tuesday, July 28, 2020
Beaches and Bucket Lists
Slaughter Beach State Park was a pretty grandiose title for
what, as far as I could tell, was just a section of beach in someone’s
backyard. I parked my car a block or so
away and strolled down a small, sandy trail, eventually finding myself at the
edge of the Atlantic. I checked my
watch as I walked; it was important to time this according to the date and the
time. The date was the night of a spring
full moon. The time was related to the
tides. Stepping onto the wet sand, I saw
that I was right on time.
The beach was covered with what appeared to be an army of
upside-down saucepans or colanders, slowly crawling from the waves onto the
shore. Though they were invisible
beneath their shells, I knew that they were walking on spindly, spider-like
legs as they began their spawning sessions, the females surrounded by males
eager for them to drop their eggs. This
was the spring breeding of the Atlantic horseshoe crabs, which I had wanted to
see for a long time and was finally in an opportune position to attend. I spent an hour or so on the beach, squatting
down or lying on my stomach to photograph the crabs, wading out in the surf
among them, or just sitting on a rock and watching them putter around like
prehistoric wind-up toys.
When the time came to leave, I dried off my feet, put my
shoes back on, and headed back to the car, still vaguely feeling like I was
trespassing in someone’s yard. Another one off the list, I thought as I
started up the car.
Whenever I find myself in a different part of the country, I start to amass a little bucket list of wildlife experiences I hope to have. Mostly they involve seeing certain animals in the wild, sometimes engaged in a specific behavior. On that same trip to the region, I saw ospreys and bald eagles nesting, observed Delmarva fox squirrels in Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, and watched wild ponies wade through the salt marshes of Assateauge Island. On other trips to other regions, I’ve seen other animals… or not seen them, based on how lucky I’ve been.
There is something very satisfying about seeing a wild
animal in an iconic setting, like American alligators in the Everglades,
prairie dogs in a Texas meadow, or humpback whales just outside of Boston
harbor. In other searches, I’ve come up
short. No red wolves were to be found
when I searched Alligator River, and no matter how many nooks and crannies I
poked into in the Sonora, I never did find a Gila monster.
There are so many more memories that I want to have – bison
and grizzlies in Yellowstone, California condors sweeping over the Grand
Canyon, moose lumbering across a New England backroad.
I’ve worked in zoos for more of my life than I haven’t, and
I love almost every minute of it. Still,
part of the purpose of the zoo is to help species persist in the wild, both
through advocacy and support-building among the public, as well as through
direct conservation. There are few
moments more powerful than seeing (in a safe, responsible manner that doesn’t
interfere with the animal’s behavior) a wild animal in its element, in its
natural environment, doing what it does naturally. The memories these moments impart can last a
lifetime. Every time I have a new one,
I’m reminded of why I want to work with wildlife conservation, and how
important it is to preserve wild places and wild animals.
Monday, July 27, 2020
Species Fact Profile: Atlantic Horseshoe Crab (Limulus polyphemus)
- Body length up to 60 centimeters (including the tail) and weigh up to 4.8 kilograms, with females being a quarter to a third larger than the males. The largest horseshoe crabs are found in the central portion of the range, with the extreme northern and southern crabs being smaller
- Front portion of the body is covered with a smooth, dome-like carapace, green, grey, or brown in color, roughly resembling a horseshoe in size. The shell is molted as the crab grows. The crab has ten legs growing from under the shell, with the mouth located in the center
- Body is divided into three segments - a head (containing most of the vital organs), the opisthosoma (middle), which contains the gills and ridges used in movement, and the tail. The long, pointed tail resembles that of a stingray, but is actually harmless; the crabs use them for steering, as well as for righting themselves if they are overturned.
- Primarily moves by walking along the bottom of the sea, but can swim on its back if needed
- This species dates back at least 450 million years, predating the dinosaurs by 200 million years. Despite their name, they are more closely related to arachnids (spiders and scorpions) than to crabs, but are part of a separate order
- Their eggs are a very important food source for migrating shorebirds. Adults and juveniles may be predated by fish and sea turtles
- Latin name translation: Limulus means "askew," while "polyphemus" was the name of a one-eyed giant (cyclops) in Greek myth. This species is believed by some to have only one eye, but actually has ten
- The species has been documented in the Pacific coast of the US, as well as Africa, Europe, and Israel, but these are believed to have been released by humans. Efforts to introduce the species to other locations for future harvesting have not proven successful
- Horseshoe crabs are used in biomedical research because of the properties of their blood. Lysate, found in the blood, clots in response to bacterial toxins, and has been used for a variety of scientific purposes, including vaccine development. Efforts are underway to develop a synthetic version which will reduce the need for live crabs to be harvested. Blood harvesting does not kill the crabs, which may be released into the wild after being drawn, but the process may reduce their chances of reproductive success
- Horseshoe crabs are most threatened by over-harvesting for human use, as well as loss of suitable habitat due to development. Climate change also reduces the availability of their preferred nesting sites.
Saturday, July 25, 2020
Self Care for Keepers
Thursday, July 23, 2020
National Zookeeper Week Bingo
Wednesday, July 22, 2020
From the News: National Zoo Reopens Friday
Monday, July 20, 2020
It's Too Hot...
Sunday, July 19, 2020
For the Animals, For Yourself
Friday, July 17, 2020
All Creatures Great and... Great
A few years back, I had friends of mine, a group of biologists
from overseas, come and stay with me for a few days. It was his first trip to the United States,
and we were excited to do the most exploring we could, packing in trips to
parks, gardens, zoos, aquariums, and museums.
We had just gotten back from the airport to my apartment, where I was
setting the table for some lunch. It was
there that my friends got their first introduction to North American wildlife.
Stepping out onto the balcony of my second-story apartment, they
found themselves entranced by a pair of grey squirrels squabbling in a tree
just a few yards away. The rodents –
what most Americans would view simply as bushy-tailed rats – chased each other
around, chattering and fussing. It was
at this moment, one told me later – not the busy airport, not the drive back
along the interstate, but this moment with the squirrels – that really put him
in the mind that he was in a different county.
I could understand what he meant. The first time I went to Africa, I saw lions,
elephants, rhinos, and leopards from the back of a land rover. I felt like I was in a particularly extravagant
zoo exhibit. It was only when I’d get
back to camp and see superb starlings perched on top of my tent, or found
myself unexpectedly sharing a bathroom with a tropical house gecko. To me, smaller animals are what set the
scenes and make a place feel “real.”
Unfortunately, as zoos continue to reinvent their exhibits
into larger, immersive habitats, the creatures which I feel do the most to actually
*immerse* a person in a landscape are being left out. Small mammal, bird, and reptile houses are
disappearing. I mean, I had anecdotally
noticed that there were fewer and fewer, but reading America’s Top 100 Zoos & Aquariums really drove the point home
to me, as the authors – fellow enthusiasts of little animals, it seems –
pointed it out whenever they did find smaller animals on display. Speaking of the Dallas Zoo’s new African
expansion, for example, they write:
“Whilst undoubtedly of
a high quality, perhaps [Giants of the Savanna] takes its name too literally because the myriad of small animals
found in nature on his continent are almost entirely excluded.”
Smaller animals may not have the star power of large animals (though there are some exceptions – red pandas, sloths, tamarins), but they have lots of advantages that they bring to the table. For one, it’s much easier to give them proportionately larger, more complicated habitats than large animals. In proportion to their body size, you can take the space that would be a single tiger habitat and make several small-cat habitats, each with the animal having proportionately more space than the tigers had.
This should be of special note to smaller
zoos – they could opt to exhibit a few very large animals (and still possibly
run into issues with space), or a lot of smaller ones.
It’s also possible to redo/remodel/renovate those exhibits more easily and frequently (and more cheaply) than it would be for large animals. I used to re-perch my tamarin and marmoset exhibits fairly often, using whatever branches and woody vines I could scavenge to give them a brand new home every few months. If I were to do that with, say, gorillas, I’d need a lot of heavy machinery and a budget of thousands, as well as to put it on the calendar months in advance.
Viewing smaller animals can also provide a more up-close,
intimate experience. This is especially
true for animals that are highly social, such as naked mole rats, meerkats, and
prairie dogs. They can be especially
appealing to young visitors, who are first coming to appreciate animals and
might view giraffes and rhinos simply as distant, hulking shapes.
Lastly, presenting smaller animals provides a more complete picture of the natural world. Many animals that we share ecosystems with are small, but zoos focus disproportionately on a few giant species. According to a paper in Scientific American, the average mammal in North America weighs 8 kilograms – about the size of a raccoon. And that’s taking into account the bison, elk, moose, and three species of bears that live here. Raccoons, of course, are doing just fine for themselves – but there are many species of smaller mammals which would benefit from more conservation attention, including more space – on-exhibit and off-exhibit – in zoos.
When my friends from abroad were visiting the US, they didn't expect to just see large mammals. They saw groundhogs, squirrels, rabbits, (road-killed) raccoons, and a host of songbirds, shorebirds, and waterfowl. It would be inaccurate for us to pretend that Africa is just the land of the giants - we should leave some room in our facilities for the little guys.
Thursday, July 16, 2020
Species Fact Profile: Largetooth Sawfish (Pristis pristis)
Capable of reaching lengths in excess of 6 meters (possibly up to 7.5 meters – largest confirmed was 7 meters in West Africa) and weigh 500-600 kilograms, though such sizes are rarely achieved anymore. “Large” specimens encountered today are often 2-2.5 meters
- Shark-like body plan, though they are more closely related to rays. Head is ventrally flattened, with the mouth and gills on the underside. Capable of breathing while lying on the ocean floor by drawing water in through the spiracles, large holes behind their eyes.Pups are born with "covered" teeth on their saws, presumably to protect their mothers during the birthing process.
- Most recognizable trait is the saw-like rostrum which represents 15-25% of the body length (proportionally longer in juveniles than in adults). It has 14-24 teeth equally spaced on each side. Females tend to have shorter saws with fewer teeth than males. The teeth of the saw are set in cartilage and do not grow back if the root becomes damaged
- Dorsal coloration is yellowish-brown, often with a yellow tint on the fins. The underside is gray or white. Individuals in fresh water may have a more reddish hue caused by blood suffusion under their skin The teeth of the saw do not fully erupt and are covered with a sheath of tissue until after birth
- Hunt using their saw-like rostrum to stir up prey from the bottom of the waterways as well as to slash at fish. No documented reports of targeting humans, though captured sawfish may defend themselves and inflict serious injuries
- Juveniles may be predated by large sharks and crocodilians
- Captive sawfish have demonstrated the ability to survive permanently in freshwater as well as salt. They also have demonstrated the ability to jump as far as 5 meters out of the water and climb using their pectoral fins, possibly an adaptation for climbing waterfalls and rapids when traveling upstream
- The genus and species name are both derived from the Greek for “saw”
- In serious decline, with extirpation likely to have occurred in the majority of countries where the species was found and all populations in decline, with many likely no longer sustainable. Degree of legal protection varies across range
- Primary threat is overfishing. The fins are used in shark fin soup, while the saws are collected for novelty items or for traditional medicinal believes (believed by some cultures to be useful for treating asthma if made into a tea). Also hunted for meat and (historically) for oil in their livers. The saw makes the fish especially vulnerable, as it becomes easily entangled in fishing nets
- Saws have been coveted throughout history, and have been found in Ancient Mayan tombs
Tuesday, July 14, 2020
From the News: Mississippi Aquarium nearly complete and ready for marine life
Monday, July 13, 2020
Let the Poster Beware
Apart from trolling it for material for the blog, I don’t
really spend a lot of time on Facebook, and I rarely post anything on my own
wall. I don’t have Twitter or
Instragram, and I’m still only vaguely aware of what TikTok is. I’m not so crotchety and anti-tech, however,
to not realize how vitally important social media is to many people, including
members of our profession. Especially
now, when so many of us are forced to keep our distance from friends and
family, social media platforms are our windows into the world. They don’t always offer the best view.
There are endless stories of people getting in trouble for
things they’ve put on Facebook or Twitter which have turned around and bitten
them in the butt. Like any business,
zoos and aquariums are cautious of how their employees reflect upon them
online. Virtually every facility has
some sort of social media policy, dictating rules on what pictures can be
posted to what rules of appropriate behavior are. Every place has a different line for what is
deemed unacceptable. Maybe it’s a
controversial or offensive opinion, or some unprofessional conduct towards
others. Sometime it is work related. I had a very stern chat with a new keeper a
few years back after a few of her colleagues showed me pictures that she had
posted on her wall of her wearing one of coatis – a particularly unpredictable
old girl who had drawn her share of blood from keeper before – around her neck
like a mink throw.
Sometimes, it’s not.
This Woman Lost Her Job For Sharing Art Showing Lynched KKK Members Because A Colleague Felt "Harassed"
Madison Hartmann, 24, was an employee of the Utah branch of the SeaQuest Aquarium chain (not to be confused with the SeaLife Aquarium chain). I say “was” because Ms. Hartmann was fired recently over posts she made on Facebook in support of the Black Lives Matter movement, which depicted members of the Ku Klux Klan being hung from a tree. After a coworker saw the post, it was reported to HR. Ms. Hartmann later modified her privacy settings, removed any mention of her employer’s name from her profile, and posted something similar. This time, she was fired
It's worth noting that the debate has nothing to do with animals. If the keeper had posted something contradictory to the ethos of zoo and aquarium keeping, such as a picture of herself engaging in an act of animal cruelty or neglect, it would be a different conversation. Most of the ensuing discussion around this case has focused
on the fact that the art that was displayed did depict violence, but violence
towards a racist organization, with people wondering if SeaQuest’s management,
or at least the complaining coworker, had sympathies with the KKK. I have no idea. Maybe that coworker lost a relative to a
suicide by hanging or something along those lines, and the depiction of a
lynching was very upsetting to them for that reason. Who knows?
I’m not passing any judgement on the Facebook posts themselves. I’m just here to look at the policy:
Know your employer’s policy for social media. Adjust your content and privacy settings
accordingly. It doesn’t hurt to remember
that relationships with coworkers change – that you might be buddy-buddy and
sharing off-color jokes one month, and the next month you might be at each
other’s throats – only now your former-friend has a bucket-load of ammo to take
to HR.
That’s why on social media I tend to watch, read, learn,
observe… but seldom post. You can call it cowardice or censorship. I think of it more as self-preservation.
Saturday, July 11, 2020
Specialty of the House
- Toledo Zoo - Hippopotamus. Toledo was the first zoo to provide underwater viewing for hippos in their Hippoquarium on their African Savannah, and it revolutionized how zoos displayed these giant mammals. Hippos went from being sedentary blobs peering out of their bathtubs to graceful behemoths that visitors could admire, in their element, from inches away. Many zoos decided that the only way to exhibit hippos properly was with this set-up, and many hippo exhibits closed, while other zoos opened new facilities to highlight the underwater world of hippos. Still, Toledo did it first, and that's why this was one the first exhibits I headed to when I visited for the first time. I'd seen hippos underwater at other zoos before, but here is where it began - including the first time visitors witnessed the birth of a hippo - underwater - before their eyes
- Phoenix Zoo - Arabian Oryx. The Arabian oryx exhibit at Phoenix isn't too impressive. Arabian oryx exhibits tend not to be - they are a desert animal, and Phoenix is a desert already, so their habitat was a simple pen. Still, there was no animal at the zoo that I was more excited to see. Phoenix was the site of the World Herd - the collaborative, international conservation breeding program which pulled together the world's last oryx and created a sustainable population which has since been used to reintroduce the species back into the wild. I'd served as a keeper for Arabian oryx at another zoo years earlier, but seeing the species here, at such a critical place in the history of the species, was very cool. I felt the same way about seeing California condors at the San Diego Zoo Safari Park or the National Zoo with golden lion tamarins
- Brookfield Zoo - Western Gorilla. Like Mr. Brown and Mr. Richardson, I'm not too impressed with the gorilla exhibit at Brookfield Zoo, located in the cavernous Tropics World building. Still, it was neat to walk up to the railing, look down into the moat, and recall the story of Binti Jua, the female gorilla who saved a small child who had toppled into her habitat years ago. This simple protective act helped change the image of gorillas in the public eye (and possibly caused some unrealistic expectations during the Harambe incident years later). Such was the impact of this incident that, if the gorillas are every relocated to a new exhibit, I hope the zoo leaves the old one there just for the history.
Friday, July 10, 2020
Book Review: America's Top 100 Zoos & Aquariums
If there is one constant among zoos and aquariums, it is change. Exhibits that were once state-of-the-art are years later considered obsolete and pulled down to make room for new habitats. Species that were once so plentiful you couldn’t give them away become virtually extinct in zoo collections year later, while others which were once considered impossible to keep, let alone breed, suddenly begin to flourish. Sometimes, entirely new facilities open. I have both versions of Allen W. Nyhius’s “America’s Best Zoos” on my book shelf – one from the 1990’s, one from 2008 or so – and in many cases, the zoos described in them are almost unrecognizable today based on their written descriptions.
That’s why I was so excited last year to see the announcement about a new work, America’s Top 100 Zoos & Aquariums by Tim Brown and Scott Richardson of the International Zoo Enthusiast Society. This handsome book, full of color photographs, documents what the authors have dubbed to be the most important (often the biggest) zoos and aquariums in the country. Each zoo is given a few pages, which includes a history of the facility, a description of its exhibits and animals, a summation of what conservation projects it is involved in, and of its top exhibits. As the book was written for zoo enthusiasts, each entry is also accompanied by a list of the animals that the authors feel that a zoo-lover must not miss; lots of these zoos have lions and gorillas, for example, but the authors want to make sure that you know that the Fort Worth Zoo, for example, has pallid bat and lesser bird-of-paradise, among other rarities.
Neither of the authors is American – Mr. Brown is British, Mr. Richardson Canadian – so they bring a unique perspective that an American zoo-goer might not have. For example, they highlight species which aren’t uncommon in American zoos (Panamanian golden frogs, for example), but which are entirely absent in European collections, while also noting species which are plentiful in European collections but are not commonly seen here. They also offer some insights into differences between European and American facilities. Walk-through lemur exhibits, for example, are far more common in the Old World, while they are largely absent here. In contrast, the authors can barely keep themselves from rolling their eyes and sighing every time they mention a kangaroo walk-through exhibit, which they seem to view as a trite American cliché.
The authors definitely know their zoos, having been to over a thousand between the two of them, and definitely seem to have firm ideas of how things “should be.” Sometimes, it’s a little wearying as they harp over a few things over and over again. I lost track of how many times in the book I came across them sniffing with disdain over how this zoo or that had the poor taste to substitute an Amur leopard for the African subspecies in a geographic-themed exhibit. Other times, what I’m going to unfairly assume is Mr. Brown’s acerbic British wit elicited a muffled chuckle from me. Speaking of Cheyenne Mountain Zoo’s reptile house, the Scutes Family Gallery, they opine that it “[presents] living herpetology as modern art… it is quite as bad as it sounds!” Ok, I’ll agree with you gentlemen on that one…
Unlike the Nyhius book, this work also pays in depth (pun unintended) attention to America’s aquariums, profiling 16 of them, in addition to a few hybrid facilities and the SeaWorld parks. In those passages, still, the focus is perhaps more heavily on the mammal, bird, and reptile components of the collections, though the fish get tolerable mention. At the end of the book, an additional 20 facilities are given brief mention. I feel like there are a few facilities which were maybe unjustly left out – Newport Aquarium? Fossil Rim? - but overall is an enjoyable, comprehensive overview of many of America’s greatest wildlife collections.
And it’ll probably be out of date within a few years…
Wednesday, July 8, 2020
Costs, Benefits, and Bearded Vultures
As a young zoo-lover, one of the most special memories of my childhood was a vacation I took about 20 years ago to the Mecca of American zoos – San Diego. There, between the Zoo, the Wild Animal Park, SeaWorld, and Birch Aquarium, I saw thousands of animals, many of them species I had never seen before in my life. Some of those species I later went on to work with as a keeper, and I saw them every day. Others, I haven’t seen since.
Among those species was a bird that I’d read about long before and had always been entranced by – the lammergeier, also known as the bearded vulture. This is a huge, shaggy raptor, once found in a sweeping arc from South Africa to Switzerland, Morocco to Mongolia, occupying desolate mountain ranges. The birds are particularly famous for subsisting on bones, which they pick up in their talons and carry to great heights, then drop to shatter on the rocks below. In my pre-Internet access days, I had no idea that I was going to see one in a towering aviary at the San Diego Zoo. When I walked down the trail and suddenly spotted it, I felt like an animal which until then had only existed in my books was suddenly real.
Apart from that one brief visit, I’ve never seen a bearded vulture. To the extent that I thought about it, I figured it would be something to look forward to if I were to take a zoo trip to Europe at some point.
The World Bird Sanctuary, located in St. Louis, recently imported a bearded vulture to its facility, along with three smaller, rarer, but equally impressive Egyptian vultures. The animal came from Kazakhstan, and is currently undergoing its mandatory quarantine period in New York before moving on to Missouri.
Part of me is so excited that I might get to see one again without booking a flight to Austria. The other part of me? Well, it’s a little skeptical.
I’ve coordinated an international transport before. It’s extremely time consuming. It’s also very expensive. It certainly takes a toll on the animal, which has to go through a very stressful transport during which everything it knows is uprooted. There’s a reason that we in the zoo community try to keep those down to a manageable level – why we aren’t swapping elephants and tigers with European or Asian zoos every other week.
This was really cool, and no doubt a major accomplishment. I’m just not sure it was worth it in this case. Importing a single bird to be used as an educational ambassador doesn’t do too much for conservation – there’s no bearded vulture population in the states for this bird to add genetic diversity too. It’s not going to dramatically alter the zoo visitor experience in the way that, say, the platypuses at San Diego will (which are also providing valuable research opportunities on keeping platypuses in American collections).
That being said, I’m totally still going to see that bird if I ever get the chance…
Tuesday, July 7, 2020
The Penguins of Our Lives
Keepers who work with large groups of social animals know that there is no drama on TV that can match what they witness every day. There's backstabbing, bickering, constantly shifting alliances and enmities, and, of course, endless romantic intrigue. Primates provide the most compelling drama, perhaps because they are the most relatable to us, but birds have more than their fair share of drama too. Penguins, for instance...
Recently, the Kyoto Aquarium in Japan posted an eye-twitching diagram of the loves and losses of their penguins. I can't speak or read Japanese, but even if I could, I still don't think I'd be able to make tux or tails of this mess, it's so complicated and confusing. Penguins are nominally monogamous of course... but hey, so are people.
Sunday, July 5, 2020
Species Fact Profile: Golden Mantella (Mantella aurantiaca)
- Body length 3-4 centimeters, with males typically being smaller, slimmer, and more angular than the females. The legs are very short (better suited to climbing than hopping) with large disks on the fingers and toes
- Coloration is a bright golden-orange color, sometimes with flashes of red on the inside of the hind legs. The eyes are black. Males have a lighter-colored stomach than females
- Bright coloration is indicative of having highly toxic skin secretions, serves as a warning color. Natural predators which seem to be resistant to the toxin are certain snakes and lizards
- Two subspecies - M. a. mylotimpanum, which has black spots over the ears, and M. a. aurantiaca, which does not
- Major threats are illegal collection for the pet trade, loss of habitat through deforestation, and the introduction of non-native predators