A rendering of the proposed aquarium, by Brevard Zoo
This little temper-tantrum (well, probably doesn't seem so little to Brevard Zoo staff) shows the inherent challenge of zoos and aquariums having to deal with politicians. They are whimsical and fickle partners, who don't always go a great job of separating what's best for the community versus what's best for their political fortunes. There are plenty of occasions in which a politician could, for just causes, decide against supporting funding for a zoo or aquarium; there are a lot of priorities out there, and public monies are a limited resource. But to do it just because they won't do exactly what you tell them to isn't governance. It's petulance.
It's tempting for a zoo to decide to do whatever
it can to avoid being seen as political (which, ironically, is what Brevard was trying to do when it tried stepping back from being involved in campaigns). Unfortunately, literally everything that is important, from conservation of species to social policies that impact the safety and wellbeing of employees, is political. It's impossible not to be political.
Ultimately, Brevard is still going to go ahead with the aquarium. They're just going to have to do it without this clown's help. Just as well - he doesn't seem like someone you'd want to be beholden to.
No comments:
Post a Comment