Sometimes there was a specific incident which triggered attention and outrage (a comment on the Oakland Zoo review I wrote reminded me of a fatal incident involving an elephant and a keeper at that facility). Sometimes the general decline and decay finally just became too bad to be overlooked any longer. In the case of Zoo Atlanta, a specific animal, Willie B the gorilla, became the rallying focus for the need to fix the zoo.
In these cases, there were always calls to shutter the zoo in question. However, in each case, the community rallied around the zoo and helped rebuild. I sometimes wonder, if such a list of bad zoos in major US cities were to come out today, how our communities would respond?
There's a tremendous loss of sense of community in many aspects of American life these days, resulting in weaker civic connections. People don't seem to experience the same pride and attachment in their cities that they used to. I see some people who share a tremendous amount of pride in their city zoos. I see plenty of people who seem determined to find fault in every part of their community, the zoo being no exception, with a constant barrage of complaints that their local community can't do anything right.
Zoo Atlanta, Audubon Zoo, and the others are now excellent facilities with admirable standards of animal care and demonstrated commitment to conservation and animal welfare - but this didn't happen in a vacuum. Turning around a zoo doesn't need complaints. It needs resources and community support. One could say that in many cases, a community has the zoo it deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment